Sie 7. Sandford
In 1856 au
"Ordinance for Buildings and Nuisance
I is still in force. It provides (winter slip)
Was passed & is still in
for proper thickness of walls + foundations, floor of houses - that all works fully under the renewal spoken
qui
fir & your better)
are
The cause an
the surveyor's inspection of the Surveyor several that
every
house should have a
to fitte.
cooking place therein
Without knowing what the difficulty is in which the Commanding Royal Engineer alluded, & what is the prohibition, it seems rather a
Arony
to require that Military
that Military Building should be
Exempted from the Ordinance
We have no information
as to the proposed
L
I Proceed as suggested I do not but I first ask the W. offer to head or, for the purpose & being transmitted to the Governor, the report of the Command. Royal Engineer referred to in
the letter
from it, we
Military
quote
8twist, or such extract
upon
the
question of Exempting
Building's from Building thin ames
I agree with Mr. Holland.
birth the was official analysis
the practical difficulties around Experienced
I as can communicate to the Governor
13/1
2. bute funcommon ther thie pejected ashain amós
Jus. 15/1
1/bib
Thulle
Antered
Hankan
2.0.259.
Whtate
War Dept.
Mato 19/1,
J. Wymon 251,
The Hanford
22
Jy
1423
Feb 6-
18-11
Zeb:869
z
340
25 Jan 1869.
Sam dintra of
Earl Granith Zahnath
The minute of your
letter
of the & minute Expressing
InterCardwells lezze That the Lordiths or ill affect
the hot attrahere, The Expediency of intestuing
into a Building
Which is said
Ordinanc
the
Unchette common of the
Col Anthontir
clause
Exempting from its
Sie 7. Sandford
In 1856 au
"Ordinance for Buildings and Nuisance
I is still in force. It provider (winter slip)
Was passed & is still in
for peeper thickness of walls + foundations, Ffloor of houses - that all works fulich wunder the renewal spoken
qui
fir & your better)
are
The caved an
the surrory timepection of the Surveyor several that
evey
hown shaved have a
to fatte.
cooking place theirn
Without kuning what the difficulty is in which the Commanday Royal Exquicer allerde,, & what is the prohibition, it seems rather a
Arony
to rquin that Ailitary
that Military Building shaved to
Exempted from the Orheiance
We han no un
Ordinance
information
as to the proposed
L
I Proceed as suggested I do tax but I first ack the W. offer to head or, for the pumpor & being travmilled to the fovernor, the report of ther Command. Royel hogeirer referred to in
the lette
from it, we
Melitay
qtte
вчал
8twist, or such extractł
upan
thu
gustine of Excmply
Building's from Buildy thin ames
I agree with. Mr. Holland.
birth the was offiin ahalis
the pramatical difficiels alund Experienced
I as can communich to the fivemer
13/1
2. bute funcommon ther thie pejected ashain amós
Jus. 15/1
1/bib
Thulle
Antered
Hankan
2.0.259.
Whtate
War Dept.
Mato 19/1,
J. Wymon 251,
The Hanford
22
Jy
管
1423
Feb 6-
18-11
Zeb:869
z
340
25 Jan 1869.
Sam dintra of
Earl Granith Zahnath
The minst of you
letten
of the & mist Expressing
InterCardwells lezze That the Lordiths or ill affect
ግ
o the hot attrahere, The Expediency of intestuing
into a Building
Which is said
Ordinanc
the
Unchette common of the
Col Anthontir
clause
Exempting from its
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.